![]() |
||||
![]() |
This is opposed to being an active candidate, someone who is actively searching for a new job. Many in the recruitment world talk about how a passive candidate is preferable to an active candidate. Many of them argue about the merits of this statement and whether or not it’s true. The idea behind this preference tends to be the thought that finding a potential employee who is hard to get is somehow more desirable than a person who is actively searching for a new job. From your perspective – the job searcher – I’d be less concerned about the definitions of the two terms and I’d be more concerned about what they mean in reality to you. To me as a recruiter, let me tell you about things that I consider when thinking about whether or not I want to help someone with their job search:
2. I don’t mind helping a job searcher who is already looking for another job but when they have applied to dozens if not hundreds of companies and haven’t found a new job yet, I start to wonder why? Plus it makes it harder for the recruiter to find good opportunities for you if you’ve already applied to numerous companies. 3. I think there is something to be said about finding a passive candidate who isn’t actively looking for a new job and who is currently and happily working. It can eliminate many issues that recruiters don’t really want to deal with. If you are not actively looking for a job, we don’t worry about competing with other recruiters trying to put the same jobs in front of you, we don’t worry about you accepting another job offer and we don’t worry about putting jobs in front of you that you might have already applied to. Return from Passive Candidate to Career Development Strategies |
|||